Bacquet, P. and Levy, E. and McGuire, A. and McMurray, J. and Merot, J. L. and Paschen, B. and Remme, W. J. and Szucs, T. D. and Klein, W. and Brunhuber, W. and Préda, István and Csanády, Miklós and Cserhalmi, L. and Edes, I. and Gesztesi, T. and Karpati, P. and Simon, K. and Tarjan, J. (2001) Reduced costs with bisoprolol treatment for heart failure - An economic analysis of the second Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS-II). European Heart Journal, 22 (12). pp. 1021-1031. ISSN 0195-668X (print), 1522-9645 (online)
Background Beta-blockers, used as an adjunctive to diuretics, digoxin and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, improve survival in chronic heart failure. We report a prospectively planned economic analysis of the cost of adjunctive beta-blocker therapy in the second Cardiac Insufficiency BIsoprolol Study (CIBIS II). Methods Resource utilization data (drug therapy, number of hospital admissions, length of hospital stay, ward type) were collected prospectively in all patients in CIBIS . These data were used to determine the additional direct costs incurred, and savings made, with bisoprolol therapy. As well as the cost of the drug, additional costs related to bisoprolol therapy were added to cover the supervision of treatment initiation and titration (four outpatient clinic/office visits). Per them (hospital bed day) costings were carried out for France, Germany and the U.K. Diagnosis related group costings were performed for France and the U.K. Our analyses took the perspective of a third party payer in France and Germany and the National Health Service in the U.K. Results Overall, fewer patients were hospitalized in the bisoprolol group, there were fewer hospital admissions perpatient hospitalized, fewer hospital admissions overall, fewer days spent in hospital and fewer days spent in the most expensive type of ward. As a consequence the cost of care in the bisoprolol group was 5-10% less in all three countries, in the per them analysis, even taking into account the cost of bisoprolol and the extra initiation/up-titration visits. The cost per patient treated in the placebo and bisoprolol groups was FF35 009 vs FF31 762 in France, DM11 563 vs DM10 784 in Germany and pound 4987 vs pound 4722 in the U.K. The diagnosis related group analysis gave similar results. Interpretation Not only did bisoprolol increase survival and reduce hospital admissions in CIBIS II, it also cut the cost of care in so doing. This `win-win' situation of positive health benefits associated with cost savings is Favourable from the point of view of both the patient and health care systems. These findings add further support for the use of beta-blockers in chronic heart failure.
|Additional Information:||Több mint 100 szerző a szerzőségben|
|Subjects:||R Medicine / orvostudomány > RZ Other systems of medicine / orvostudomány egyéb területei|
|Depositing User:||Erika Bilicsi|
|Date Deposited:||13 Nov 2012 12:24|
|Last Modified:||13 Nov 2012 14:57|
Actions (login required)