1. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724-1732. 

2. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213-224.

3. Xaplanteris P, Fournier S, Pijls NHJ, et al. Five-year outcomes with PCI guided by fractional flow reserve. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:250-259. 

4. Parikh RV, Liu G, Plomondon ME, et al. Utilization and outcomes of measuring fractional flow reserve in patients with stable ischemic Heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:409-419. 

5. V€lz S, Dworeck C, Redfors B, et al. Survival of patients with angina pectoris o undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with intracoronary pressure wire guidance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:2785-2799. 

6. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1989-1997. 

7. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA. 2012;308:1237-1245. 

8. Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1145-1155.

9. Driessen RS, Danad I, Stuijfzand WJ, et al. Comparison of coronary computed tomography angiography, fractional flow reserve, and perfusion imaging for ischemia Diagnosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:161-173. 

10. Renker M, Schoepf UJ, Wang R, et al. Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114: 1303-1308. 

11. Coenen A, Lubbers MM, Kurata A, et al. Fractional flow reserve computed from noninvasive CT angiography data: diagnostic performance of an on-site clinician operated computational fluid dynamics algorithm. Radiology. 2015;274:674-683.

12. Donnelly PM, Kolossv�ry M, Kar�dy J, et al. Experience with an on-site coronary

a a computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve algorithm for the assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses. Am J Cardiol. 2018;121:9-13. 

13. Kumamaru KK, Fujimoto S, Otsuka Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 3D deep-learning based fully automated estimation of patient-level minimum fractional flow reserve from coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;21:437-445. 

14. Fujimoto S, Kawasaki T, Kumamaru KK, et al. Diagnostic performance of on-site computed CT-fractional flow reserve based on fluid structure interactions: comparison with invasive fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;20:343-352. 

15. van Hamersvelt RW, Voskuil M, de Jong PA, Willemink MJ, I�gum I, Leiner T.

s Diagnostic performance of on-site coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve based on patient-specific lumped parameter models. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2019;1:e190036. 

16. Giannopoulos AA, Keller L, Sepulcri D, et al. High-speed onsite deep-learning based FFR-CT algorithm: evaluation using invasive angiography as reference standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Oct;221(4):460-470. 

17. Ihdayhid AR, Ben Zekry S. Machine learning CT FFR: the evolving role of on-site techniques. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020;2:e200228. 

18. Lu MT, Ferencik M, Roberts RS, et al. Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography: management and outcomes in the PROMISE trial. JACC (J Am Coll Cardiol): Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017;10:1350-1358. 

19. Patel MR, Nørgaard BL, Fairbairn TA, et al. 1-Year impact on medical practice and clinical outcomes of FFR(CT): the ADVANCE registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:97-105. 

20. Madsen KT, Noergaard BL, Oevrehus KA, et al. Prognostic value of FFRCT in patients with stable chest pain - a 3-year follow-up of the ADVANCE-DK registry. Eur Heart J. 2022;43. 

21. Nørgaard BL, Gaur S, Fairbairn TA, et al. Prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiographic derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and

22. Barbato E, Toth GG, Johnson NP, et al. A prospective natural history study of coronary atherosclerosis using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68: 2247-2255.

23. Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/ SCMR guideline for the evaluation and Diagnosis of chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:e187-e285.

24. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Chest pain. NICE Pathway. Manchester: NICE; 2017. https://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/chest-pain.

25. Douglas PS, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, et al. 1-Year outcomes of FFRCT-guided care in patients with suspected coronary disease: the PLATFORM study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:435-445.

26. Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1395-1407.

27. Kobayashi Y, Takahashi T, Zimmermann FM, et al. Outcomes based on angiographic vs functional significance of complex 3-vessel coronary disease: FAME 3 trial. JACC

Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16:2112-2119.

28. Rioufol G, D�rimay F, Roubille F, et al. Fractional flow reserve to guide treatment of

epatients with multivessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78: 1875-1885.

29. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/

American Heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines.

Circulation. 2022;145:e18-e114.

30. Curzen NP, Nolan J, Zaman AG, Nørgaard BL, Rajani R. Does the routine availability of CT-derived FFR influence management of patients with stable chest pain

compared to CT angiography alone?: the FFR(CT) RIPCORD study. JACC Cardiovasc

Imaging. 2016;9:1188-1194.

31. Lu MT, Ferencik M, Roberts RS, et al. Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography: management and outcomes in the PROMISE trial. JACC Cardiovasc

Imaging. 2017;10:1350-1358.

32. Fairbairn TA, Nieman K, Akasaka T, et al. Real-world clinical utility and impact on

clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived

fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE Registry. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:

3701-3711.

33. Douglas ea. The PRECISE Trial. . Presented at AHA Scientific Sessions 2022 Clinical Events Committee (CEC). 34. Abbara S, Blanke P, Maroules CD, et al. SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the society

of cardiovascular computed tomography guidelines committee: endorsed by the

North American society for cardiovascular imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput

Tomogr. 2016;10:435-449.

35. Tesche C, Otani K, De Cecco CN, et al. Influence of coronary calcium on diagnostic

performance of machine learning CT-FFR: results from MACHINE registry. JACC (J

Am Coll Cardiol): Cardiovascular Imaging. 2020;13:760-770.

36. Mickley H, Veien KT, Gerke O, et al. Diagnostic and clinical value of FFRCT in stable

chest pain patients with extensive coronary calcification. JACC (J Am Coll Cardiol):

Cardiovascular Imaging. 2022;15:1046-1058.

37. Gaur S, Taylor CA, Jensen JM, et al. FFR derived from coronary CT angiography in nonculprit lesions of patients with recent STEMI. JACC (J Am Coll Cardiol):

Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017;10:424-433.

38. Douglas PS, Nanna MG, Kelsey MD, et al. Comparison of an initial risk-based testing

strategy vs usual testing in stable symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the PRECISE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2023;8:

904-914.

39. Nørgaard BL, Terkelsen CJ, Mathiassen ON, et al. Coronary CT angiographic and

flow reserve-guided management of patients with stable ischemic Heart disease.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:2123-2134.

40. Takagi H, Leipsic JA, McNamara N, et al. Trans-lesional fractional flow reserve gradient as derived from coronary CT improves patient management: ADVANCE

registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022;16:19-26.

41. Kueh SH, Mooney J, Ohana M, et al. Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary

computed tomography angiography reclassification rate using value distal to lesion compared to lowest value. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11:462-467.

42. Lee JM, Choi G, Koo BK, et al. Identification of high-risk plaques destined to cause

acute coronary syndrome using coronary computed tomographic angiography and

computational fluid dynamics. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:1032-1043.

43. Koo BK, Yang S, Jung JW, et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled quantitative coronary

plaque and hemodynamic analysis for predicting acute coronary syndrome. JACC

Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024;17:1062-1076.

44. Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, et al. CAD-RADS™ 2.0 - 2022 coronary artery

disease-reporting and data system: an expert consensus document of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography (SCCT), the American College of

Cardiology (ACC), the American College of radiology (ACR), and the North

America society of cardiovascular imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc CompTomograph. 2022;16:536-557.

45. Thompson AG, Raju R, Blanke P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and discrimination of

ischemia by fractional flow reserve CT using a clinical use rule: results from the Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic

Angiography study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015;9:120-128. 46. Douglas PS, Pontone G, Hlatky MA, et al. Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs.

usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective

longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study. Eur Heart J.

47. Packard RR, Li D, Budoff MJ, Karlsberg RP. Fractional flow reserve by computerized tomography and subsequent coronary revascularization. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:145-152. 

48. Fairbairn TA, Dobson R, Hurwitz-Koweek L, et al. Sex differences in coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from ADVANCE. JACC (J Am Coll Cardiol): Cardiovascular Imaging. 2020;13: 2576-2587. 

49. Grover R, Leipsic JA, Mooney J, et al. Coronary lumen volume to myocardial mass ratio in primary microvascular angina. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11: 423-428. 

50. Rodriguez Lozano PF, Rrapo Kaso E, Bourque JM, et al. Cardiovascular imaging for ischemic Heart disease in women: time for a paradigm shift. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15:1488-1501. 

51. Coenen A, Kim Y-H, Kruk M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a machine-learning approach to coronary computed tomographic angiography-based fractional flow reserve. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2018;11:e007217. 

52. Varga-Szemes A, Schoepf UJ, Maurovich-Horvat P, et al. Coronary plaque assessment of Vasodilative capacity by CT angiography effectively estimates 53. Nurmohamed Nick S, Danad I, Jukema Ruurt A et al. Development and validation of

a quantitative coronary CT angiography model for Diagnosis of vessel-specific coronary ischemia. JACC (J Am Coll Cardiol): Cardiovascular Imaging;0.

54. B€r S, Nabeta T, Maaniitty T, et al. Prognostic value of a novel artificial intelligence-based a

coronary computed tomography angiography-derived ischaemia algorithm for patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;25:657-667.

55. Andreini D, Modolo R, Katagiri Y, et al. Impact of fractional flow reserve derived

from coronary computed tomography angiography on Heart team treatment

decision-making in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: insights from the SYNTAX III REVOLUTION trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e007607.

56. Collet C, Collison D, Mizukami T, et al. Differential improvement in angina and

health-related quality of life after PCI in focal and diffuse coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:2506-2518.

57. Sonck J, Nagumo S, Norgaard BL, et al. Clinical validation of a virtual planner for

coronary interventions based on coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15:1242-1255.

58. Belmonte M, Maeng M, Collet C, et al. Accuracy of a virtual PCI planner based on

coronary CT angiography in calcific lesions. J Cardiovasc Comp Tomograph. 2023