Should we abandon the patient-specific instrumentation ship in total knee arthroplasty? Not quite yet!

Török, László and Jávor, Péter János and Hartmann, Petra and Bánki, László and Varga, Endre (2021) Should we abandon the patient-specific instrumentation ship in total knee arthroplasty? Not quite yet! BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 22. ArtNo:730. ISSN 1471-2474

Preview

Text TorokShouldweabandonBMC.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (587kB) | Preview

Abstract

Patient-specific Instrumentation (PSI) is an innovative technique aiding the precise implementation of the preoperative plan during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by using patient-specific guides and cutting blocks. Despite of the theoretical advantages, studies have reported contradictory results, thus there is no consensus regarding the overall effectiveness of PSI. Through the critical assessment of a meta-analysis published lately, this correspondence aims to highlight the complexity of comparing the efficacy of PSI to standard instrumentation (SI). The accuracy of component alignment, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), surgery time, blood loss, transfusion rate, and postoperative complications are commonly used outcomes for investigating the efficacy of PSI-aided TKA. By assessing component alignment, the expertise of the surgeon(s) should be taken into consideration, since PSI may not provide benefits for expert surgeons but might improve accuracy and patient safety during the learning curve of novice surgeons. With respect to PROMs and postoperative complications, PSI may not improve short-term results; however, long-term follow up data is missing. Regarding transfusion rates, favorable trends can be observed, but further studies utilizing recent data are needed for a clear conclusion. When assessing surgery time, we suggest focusing on operating room turnover instead of procedure time.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item