Bones or Stones: How Can We Apply Geophysical Techniques in Bone Research?

Szekanecz, Zoltán and Besnyi, Anikó and Kónya, Péter and Füri, Judit Izabella and Király, Edit and Bertalan, Éva and Falus, György and Udvardi, Beatrix and Kovácsné Kis, Viktória and Andrássy, László and Maros, Gyula and Fancsik, Tamás and Pethő, Zsófia and Gomez, Izabella Ilona and Horváth, Ágnes and Gulyás, Katalin and Juhász, Balázs and Hodosi, Katalin and Sándor, Zsuzsa and Bhattoa Harjit, Pál and Kovács, István J. (2024) Bones or Stones: How Can We Apply Geophysical Techniques in Bone Research? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 25 (19). No.-10733. ISSN 1661-6596

Preview

Text SzekaneczetalBonesorstonesIJMS2024.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (809kB) | Preview

Abstract

Some studies have used physical techniques for the assessment of bone structure and composition. However, very few studies applied multiple techniques, such as those described below, at the same time. The aim of our study was to determine the chemical and mineralogical/organic composition of bovine tibial bone samples using geophysical/geochemical reference techniques. X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetry (TG), Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry with attenuated total reflectance accessory (FTIR-ATR), inductively coupled mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and inductively coupled optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) were applied to measure the organic and inorganic composition of 14 bovine bone samples. In addition, peripheral quantitative CT (QCT) was used to assess BMD in these bones. We were able to define the total composition of the studied bone samples. ICP-OES and ICP-MS techniques were used to determine the major and trace element composition. The X-ray analysis could detect inorganic crystalline compounds of bones, such as bioapatite, and its degree of ordering, indicating whether the bones belong to a younger or older individual. The total volatile content of the samples was calculated using TG and resulted in about 35 weight% (wt%). This, together with the 65 wt% total resulting from the chemical analysis (i.e., inorganic components), yielded a total approaching 100 wt%. As a large portion of the volatile content (H2O, CO2, etc.) was liberated from the organic components and, subordinately, from bioapatite, it could be concluded that the volatile-to-solid ratio of the examined bone samples was ~35:65. The FTIR-ATR analysis revealed that the organic portion consists of collagens containing amide groups, as their typical bands (OH, CH, CO, NC) were clearly identified in the infrared spectra. Numerous parameters of bone composition correlated with BMD as determined by QCT. In conclusion, we performed a complex evaluation of bovine bones to test multiple geophysical/geochemical techniques in bone research in association with QCT bone densitometry. From a medical point of view, the composition of the studied bones could be reliably examined by these methods.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item