Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"

Anderson, C. J. and Bahnik, Štěpán and Barnett-Cowan, M. and Bosco, F. A. and Chandler, J. and Fedor, Anna (2016) Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". SCIENCE, 351 (6277). pp. 1-3. ISSN 0036-8075

Preview

Text Anderson_et_al.___2016___Response_to_Comment_on_Estimating_the_reproducibility_of_psychological_science_u.pdf Download (233kB) | Preview

Abstract

Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration’s Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item