Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis with biologics and targeted physical therapy: positive effect on chest pain, diminished chest mobility, and respiratory function

Némethné Gyurcsik, Zsuzsanna and Bodnár, N. and Szekanecz, Zoltán and Szántó, Sándor Zoltán (2013) Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis with biologics and targeted physical therapy: positive effect on chest pain, diminished chest mobility, and respiratory function. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 72 (10). pp. 997-1004. ISSN 0340-1855

Text cikk7.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (704kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Biologics are highly effective in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). In this self-controlled study, we assessed the additive value of complex physiotherapy in decreasing chest pain and tenderness and improving respiratory function in AS patients treated with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The trial consisted of 2 parts. In study I, clinical data of AS patients with (n=55) or without biological therapy (n=20) were retrospectively analyzed and compared. Anthropometrical data, duration since diagnosis and patient assessment of disease activity, pain intensity, tender points, sacroiliac joint involvement determined by X-ray, functional condition, and physical activity level were recorded. Subjective, functional, and physical tests were performed. In study II, 10 voluntary patients (6 men and 4 women, age 52.4 +/- 13.6 years) with definite AS and receiving anti-TNF therapy were recruited. It was a prospective, non-randomized physiotherapeutic trial. BASFI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index), BASDAI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index), modified Schober Index, occiput-to-wall distance, and fingertip-to-floor distance were evaluated. Forced vital capacity, forced 1-s expiratory volume, peak expiratory flow, and maximum voluntary ventilation were recorded. Furthermore, typical tender points were recorded. A targeted physiotherapy program was conducted twice a week for 12 weeks and all above parameters were recorded at baseline and after 12 weeks. RESULTS: Differences in patient assessment of disease activity (p=0.019) and pain intensity (p=0.017) were found in study I. Pain and tenderness of the thoracic spine were observed in both groups. Back pain without biologic therapy was slightly higher than other group. In study II, we found that patient assessment of disease activity and pain intensity significantly improved after the physical therapy program (p=0.002 and p<0.001). BASFI and BASDAI increased after treatment (p=0.004 and p<0.001). The finger-to-floor distance, chest expansion, and modified Schober index increased (p=0.008, p<0.001, and p=0.031, respectively). The respiratory functional parameters showed a tendency towards improvement. CONCLUSION: AS patients already receiving biological therapy may benefit from additional targeted physiotherapy. Physical therapy may be of important additive value in AS patients being treated with biological. The exercise program presented here showed an improvement in functional parameters as well as spine and chest mobility, thereby enhancing the favorable effects of biological therapy.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item