Are competition and extrinsic motivation reliable predictors of academic cheating?

Orosz, Gábor and Farkas, Dávid and Roland-Lévy, Christine (2013) Are competition and extrinsic motivation reliable predictors of academic cheating? Frontiers in Educational Psychology, 4 (87). pp. 1-16.

Preview

Text fpsyg-04-00087.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that extrinsic motivation and competition are reliable predictors of academic cheating. The aim of the present questionnaire study was to separate the effects of motivation- and competition-related variables on academic cheating by Hungarian high school students (N = 620, M = 264, F = 356). Structural equation modeling showed that intrinsic motivation has a negative effect, and amotivation has a positive indirect effect on self-reported academic cheating. In contrast, extrinsic motivation had no significant effect. Indirect positive influence on cheating, based on some characteristics of hypercompetition, was also found, whereas attitudes toward self-developmental competition had a mediated negative influence. Neither constructive nor destructive competitive classroom climate had a significant impact on academic dishonesty. Acceptance of cheating and guilt has significant and direct effect on self-reported cheating. In comparison with them, the effects of motivational and competition-related variables are relatively small, even negligible. These results suggest that extrinsic motivation and competition are not amongst the most reliable predictors of academic cheating behavior.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item