Sandu-Dediu, Valentina (2018) George Enescu, Posthumously Reviewed. Studia Musicologica, 59 (1-2). pp. 61-69. ISSN 1788-6244 (print); 1789-2422 (online)
|
Text
6.2018.59.1-2.5.pdf Download (192kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This essay tackles some aspects related to the attitude of the Romanian officials after George Enescu left his country definitively (in 1946). For example, recent research through the archives of the former secret police shows that Enescu was under the close supervision of Securitate during his last years in Paris. Enescu did not generate a compositional school during his lifetime, like for instance Arnold Schoenberg did. His contemporaries admired him, but each followed their own path and had to adapt differently to an inter-war, then to a post-war, Communist Romania. I will therefore sketch the approach of younger composers in relation to Enescu (after 1955): some of them attempted to complete unfinished manuscripts; others were influenced by ideas of Enescu's music. The posthumous reception of Enescu means also an intense debate in the Romanian milieu about his “national” and “universal” output.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | MTA KFB támogatási szerződés alapján archiválva |
| Subjects: | M Music and Books on Music / zene, szövegkönyvek, kották > M1 Music / zene M Music and Books on Music / zene, szövegkönyvek, kották > M1 Music / zene > M10 Theory and philosophy of music / zeneelmélet, muzikológia |
| Depositing User: | Violetta Baliga |
| Date Deposited: | 11 Oct 2019 07:33 |
| Last Modified: | 30 Jun 2020 23:29 |
| URI: | http://real.mtak.hu/id/eprint/102161 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit Item |
