Kerényi, Bálint (2021) Huns and Bulgars. ACTA ANTIQUA ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE, 61 (3). pp. 295-306. ISSN 0044-5975 (print); 1588-2543 (online)
|
Text
1588-2543-article-p295.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (548kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The primary aim of the article is to present a different approach in the critic of sources concerning the reconstruction of „late Hunnic” and „early Bulgaric” period of steppe history. In the last half century it became a main narrative in research, that the Bulgars, appearing around the 480’s on the Balkan Peninsula, are identical with those Oguric tribes (Saragur, Ogur, Onogur), that – according to Priscus rhetor – arrived to the eastern part of the European steppe circa 463. Also it is assumed by certain authors, that in the years following the battle at Nedao river (455) the Hunnic tribes, overrun by the newcomers, fled behind the Moesian borders of the East-Roman empire and lost all the continuity of their political and ethnic existense. Analyzing however the sources providing information on this period - Jordanes’ Getica, the works of Cassiodorus, Ennodius, Malalas, Procopius and others –, we can let ourselves to assume differently. Although in this article I do not deal with the questions related to early Hungarian history, it is clear enough, how important the above mentioned problem is in view of these questions as well.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | MTA KFB támogatási szerződés alapján archiválva |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | late antique and early medieval historiography, steppe history, Getica, Goths, Huns, origin of the Bulgars, Onogurs |
Subjects: | P Language and Literature / nyelvészet és irodalom > PA Classical philology / klasszika-filológia |
Depositing User: | Violetta Baliga |
Date Deposited: | 28 Nov 2022 10:53 |
Last Modified: | 07 Sep 2023 07:21 |
URI: | https://real.mtak.hu/id/eprint/154007 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Edit Item |