Comparison of three modelling frameworks for aquatic ecosystems: practical aspects and applicability

Patonai, Katalin and Fábián, Virág Adrienn (2022) Comparison of three modelling frameworks for aquatic ecosystems: practical aspects and applicability. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY, 23 (3). pp. 439-451. ISSN 1585-8553 (print); 1588-2756 (online)

Preview

Text s42974-022-00117-3.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Freshwater ecosystems are under multiple stressors and it is crucial to find methods to better describe, manage, and sustain aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystem modelling has become an important tool in integrating trophic relationships into food webs, assessing important nodes using network analysis, and making predictions via simulations. Fortunately, several modelling techniques exist, but the question is which approach is relevant and applicable when? In this study, we compare three modelling frameworks (Ecopath, Loop Analysis in R, STELLA software) using a case study of a small aquatic network (8 nodes). The choice of framework depends on the research question and data availability. We approach this topic from a methodological aspect by describing the data requirements and by comparing the applicability and limitations of each modelling approach. Each modelling framework has its specific focus, but some functionalities and outcomes can be compared. The predictions of Loop Analysis as compared to Ecopath’s Mixed Trophic Impact plot are in good agreement at the top and bottom trophic levels, but the middle trophic levels are less similar. This suggests that further comparisons are needed of networks of varying resolution and size. Generally, when data are limiting, Loop Analysis can provide qualitative predictions, while the other two methods provide quantitative results, yet rely on more data.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item