Alexander was Great, but Rome is Greater: Considering Livy's Depiction of Alexander

Overtoom, Nikolaus Leo (2023) Alexander was Great, but Rome is Greater: Considering Livy's Depiction of Alexander. ACTA ANTIQUA ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE, 63 (1). pp. 59-75. ISSN 0044-5975 (print); 1588-2543 (online)

Text 068-article-p59.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 30 August 2025. Download (773kB)

Abstract

The Romans were conquerors, and it is unsurprising that they looked favorably upon the greatest conqueror of antiquity, Alexander the Great. In Livy's Ab Urbe Condita, there are several passages in which he uses the image of Alexander to help craft his own concept of Rome's place within the wider Hellenistic world, especially within the eastern Mediterranean. Livy, despite his generally positive opinion of Alexander, ultimately created scenarios where he portrayed the Romans as superior to the Macedonian king, first, because of the primary focus of Livy's history, namely the rise of Rome to Mediterranean dominance, and second, because of the political atmosphere in which Livy was writing, namely the complete submission of the Mediterranean basin under Augustus' empire. Although scattered throughout Livy's extensive writing, when analyzed together these passages illustrate a persistent and connected motif that influences Livy's larger narrative: Alexander was great, but Rome is greater.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item