Can the processing of task-irrelevant threatening stimuli be inhibited? : The role of shape and valence in the saliency of threatening objects

Pakai-Stecina, Diána T. and Hout, Michael C. and Bali, Cintia and Zsidó, András N. (2024) Can the processing of task-irrelevant threatening stimuli be inhibited? : The role of shape and valence in the saliency of threatening objects. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 243. No. 104150. ISSN 00016918

Preview

Text 1-s2.0-S0001691824000271-main.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (613kB) | Preview

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated that attention is quickly oriented towards threatening stimuli, and that this attentional bias is difficult to inhibit. The root cause(s) of this bias may be attributable to the affective (e.g., valence) or visual features (e.g., shape) of threats. In two experiments (behavioral, eye-tracking), we tested which features play a bigger role in the salience of threats. In both experiments, participants looked for a neutral target (butterfly, lock) among other neutral objects. In half of the trials a threatening (snake, gun) or nonthreatening (but visually similar; worm, hairdryer) task-irrelevant distractor was also present at a near or far distance from the target. Behavioral results indicate that both distractor types interfered with task performance. Rejecting nonthreatening distractors as nontargets was easier when they were presented further from the target but distance had no effect when the distractor was threatening. Eye-tracking results showed that participants fixated less often (and for less time) on threatening compared to nonthreatening distractors. They also viewed targets for less time when a threatening distractor was present (compared to nonthreatening). Results suggest that visual features of threats are easier to suppress than affective features, and the latter may have a stronger role in eliciting attentional biases.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item