Value chains for sustainable mountain developmen : a qualitative understanding of 23 European cases

Blackstock, Kirsty and Creaney, Rachel and Delgado-Serrano, Mar del Mar and Flanigan, Sharon and Ievoli, Corrado and Moretti, Michele and Nemes, Gusztáv and Surovà, Diana and Thompson, Chloe and Zagata, Lukas and Allali, Tarek and Belliggiano, Angelo and Carvalho, Ana and Conte, Ana Paula and Esgalhado, Catarina and Geiser, Anna and Husák, Jakub and Karner, Sandra and Maestre-Diaz, Carmen and Vicente, Raquel Moreno and Micheloni, Cristina and Orbán, Éva and Piccin, Lucca and Redman, Mark and Ramadani, Nehat and Rogozan, Catalina and Sorba, Jean-Michel and Trentin, Marco and Triliva, Sofia and Yercan, Murat (2025) Value chains for sustainable mountain developmen : a qualitative understanding of 23 European cases. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 118. ISSN 0743-0167

Preview

Text 1-s2.0-S0743016725000804-main.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (7MB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper presents findings using a novel, qualitative and interpretative approach to value chain assessment. The approach was used to further understand sustainable mountain development. The findings result from 23 diverse cases across 16 European countries, including value chains that focus on animal production for meat and dairy products, arable, horticultural and alcohol production as well as tourism and public goods. The paper focuses on three types of value (economic, socio-cultural and environmental) that are developed along the four stages of each value chain (Production, Processing, Distribution/Marketing and Consumption). It addresses how and why value chain actors perceived changes to these three types of values, including how the value chain is tele-coupled with other sending or receiving systems; and how the focal value chains intertwine with other mountain value chains. In general, the value chains actors’ perceived that positive values were added, supporting sustainable mountain development in our cases, but the findings were most positive for economic issues and least positive for environmental issues. Findings support neo-endogenous rural development arguments. Local cooperation and certification of sustainable practices seem to support valorisation and retain these values in the mountains. We contend that using a value chain lens for mountain development has helped improve the breadth of analysis and highlights the need to consider non-mountain actors and processes within sustainable development processes.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item