Comparison of Five Rehabilitation Interventions for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Trial

Tollár, József and Kóra, Szilvia and Kós, Petra and Vadászi, Zoltán and Drotár, István and Prukner, Péter and Wersényi, György and Haidegger, Tamás and Vetrovszky, Tomas and Hortobágyi, Tibor (2025) Comparison of Five Rehabilitation Interventions for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Trial. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 14 (5). No. 1648. ISSN 2077-0383

Preview

Text jcm-14-01648 (1).pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (488kB) | Preview

Abstract

Comparative efficacy of rehabilitation interventions in persons with acute ischemic stroke (PwS) is limited. This randomized trial assessed the immediate and lasting effects of five interventions on clinical and mobility outcomes in 75 PwS. Methods: Five days after stroke, 75 PwS were randomized into five groups: physical therapy (CON, standard care, once daily); walking with a soft robotic exoskeleton (ROB, once daily); agility exergaming once (EXE1, once daily) or twice daily (EXE2, twice daily); and combined EXE1+ROB in two daily sessions. Interventions were performed 5 days per week for 3 weeks. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and after 5 weeks of detraining. Results: Modified Rankin Scale (primary outcome) and Barthel Index showed no changes. EXE1, EXE2, ROB, and EXE1+ROB outperformed standard care (CON) in five secondary outcomes (Berg balance scale, 10m walking speed, 6-min walk test with/without robot, standing balance), with effects sustained after 5 weeks. Dose effects (EXE1 vs. EXE2) were minimal, while EXE1+ROB showed additive effects in 6-min walk tests. Conclusions: These novel comparative data expand evidence-based options for therapists to design individualized rehabilitation plans for PwS. Further confirmation is needed.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item