Is a Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trial Outcomes for Ketogenic Diets Justifiable? A Critical Assessment Based on Systematic Research.

Hunter, Nicole and Czina, László and Murányi, Edit and Németh, Balázs and Varjas, Tímea and Szendi, Katalin (2024) Is a Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trial Outcomes for Ketogenic Diets Justifiable? A Critical Assessment Based on Systematic Research. Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 13 (20). No. 3219. ISSN 2304-8158

Preview

Text Hunter_Czina_Muranyi_Szendi_Foods_2024.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (472kB) | Preview

Abstract

While the macronutrient content of a ketogenic diet specifically utilized for childhood epilepsy is clearly defined in the literature, variations among other ketogenic diets exhibit substantial heterogeneity. Furthermore, studies utilizing ketogenic diets contain several confounders with notable impacts on outcomes, thereby rendering both their findings and those of the meta-analyses less reliable. The objective of this meta-epidemiological assessment was to scrutinize existing clinical trials that investigated the effects of ketogenic diets on patients with obesity and diabetes, thereby determining the feasibility of conducting a meta-analysis. The Ovid Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase databases were searched from 1946 to 24 September 2024. Of the studies reviewed, none met the predefined inclusion criteria. However, seven articles met these criteria very closely. In the future, studies investigating the effects of ketogenic diets containing significant confounding factors should adopt a single definition of a ketogenic diet. Additionally, accurate measurement of actual macronutrient and caloric intake, along with regularly monitored nutritional ketosis, will be essential to highlight the true effects of a ketogenic diet.

Actions (login required)

View Item