Fekete, Balázs (2013) The Revival of Comparative Law in a Socialist Country: The Impact of Imre Szabó and Gyula Eörsi on the Development of Hungarian Comparative Law. REVIEW OF CENTRAL AND EAST EUROPEAN LAW, 38 (1). pp. 37-52. ISSN 0925-9880
|
Text
Fekete_tanulmány.pdf - Published Version Download (439kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article discusses the revival of comparative law in Hungarian Socialist jurisprudence. Prior to World War II, the development of comparative law generally had followed international trends; however, it was disrupted at both a personal and an institutional level at the end of the 1940s due to the Marxist-Leninist turn of legal thinking that accompanied the introduction of a Communist regime in the country. Nonetheless, this rejection of comparative law was gradually replaced by a more open attitude that strongly supported participation in the international comparative-law movement from the 1960s. Imre Szabó and Gyula Eörsi played a prominent role in this transformation. They legitimized the use of comparative methods in socialist jurisprudence and, also, created a plausible conceptual framework for Socialist comparative law.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | K Law / jog > K Law (General) / jogtudomány általában |
Depositing User: | Veronika Tamás |
Date Deposited: | 05 Feb 2014 13:33 |
Last Modified: | 05 Feb 2019 00:15 |
URI: | http://real.mtak.hu/id/eprint/9791 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Edit Item |