REAL

Can Autonomous Agents Without Phenomenal Consciousness Be Morally Responsible?

Bernáth, László (2021) Can Autonomous Agents Without Phenomenal Consciousness Be Morally Responsible? PHILOSOPHY & TECHNOLOGY. pp. 1-20. ISSN 2210-5433 (print); 2210-5441 (online)

[img]
Preview
Text
Bernáth2021_Article_CanAutonomousAgentsWithoutPhen.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (711kB) | Preview

Abstract

It is an increasingly popular view among philosophers that moral responsibility can, in principle, be attributed to unconscious autonomous agents. This trend is already remarkable in itself, but it is even more interesting that most proponents of this view provide more or less the same argument to support their position. I argue that as it stands, the Extension Argument, as I call it, is not sufficient to establish the thesis that unconscious autonomous agents can be morally responsible. I attempt to show that the Extension Argument should overcome especially strong ethical considerations; moreover, its epistemological grounds are not too solid, partly because the justifications of its premises are in conflict.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion / filozófia, pszichológia, vallás > BD Speculative Philosophy / rendszeres filozófia > BD3 Philosophy of mind and spirit / szellem filozófiája > BD352 Phenomenalism / fenomenológia
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion / filozófia, pszichológia, vallás > BJ Ethics / erkölcstan
Depositing User: László Bernáth
Date Deposited: 10 Aug 2021 06:39
Last Modified: 10 Aug 2021 06:39
URI: http://real.mtak.hu/id/eprint/128236

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item