Are higher blood flow restriction pressures more beneficial when lower loads are used?

Dankel, SJ and Jessee, MB and Buckner, SL and Mouser, JG and Mattocks, KT and Loenneke, JP (2017) Are higher blood flow restriction pressures more beneficial when lower loads are used? Physiology International, 104 (3). pp. 247-257. ISSN 2498-602X

Preview

Text 2060.104.2017.3.2.pdf Download (92kB) | Preview

Abstract

The application of blood flow restriction during low-load resistance exercise has been shown to induce muscle growth with high or low restriction pressures, however, loads lower than 20% one-repetition maximum (1RM) remain unexplored. Fourteen trained individuals completed six elbow flexion protocols involving three different loads (10%, 15%, and 20% 1RM) each of which was performed with either a low (40% arterial occlusion) or high (80% arterial occlusion) pressure. Pre- and post-measurements of surface electromyography (sEMG), isometric torque, and muscle thickness were analyzed. An interaction was present for torque (p < 0.001) and muscle thickness (p < 0.001) illustrating that all increases in pressure and/or load resulted in a greater fatigue and muscle thickness. There was no interaction for sEMG (p = 0.832); however, there were main effects of condition (p = 0.002) and time (p = 0.019) illustrating greater sEMG in the 20% 1RM conditions. Higher blood flow restriction pressures may be more beneficial for muscle growth when very low loads are used.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item