Szókratész igazmondása, vagyis a „parrhészia” mint negyedik retorikai kategória Michel Foucault vizsgálódásaiban

Vasas, Tamás (2024) Szókratész igazmondása, vagyis a „parrhészia” mint negyedik retorikai kategória Michel Foucault vizsgálódásaiban. JOG ÁLLAM POLITIKA: JOG- ÉS POLITIKATUDOMÁNYI FOLYÓIRAT, 16 (1). pp. 77-84. ISSN 2060-4580

Preview

Text JAP_2024_01_vasas_tamas.pdf - Published Version Download (270kB) | Preview

Abstract

Through the examination of Foucault’s treatises, I seek to uncover how the concept of “parrhesia” within the rhetorical discourse and context system of justice, as interpreted by Foucault, sheds light on discussions about truth and legal theory, providing a facet for analysis in investigations. Is there a quasi-functional truth, stemming from the substantive aspects of justice, that exists independently and separately, capable of resolving issues with or without an intrinsic, self-interested value? Can there be a discourse of truth devoid of function, where the value of truth exists inherently within the justice system? The legal philosophy, legal rhetoric, state and political philosophical discourses are becoming more and more interesting these days. Beyond classic legal reasoning and rhetorical formulas, they represent the frontiers of jurisprudence, exploring interdisciplinary relationships and itemized jurisprudence. This scientific legal reasoning also significantly influences the methodology of legal studies, as elucidated by Foucault’s rich and complex analyses. A language-philosophical and rhetorical system with ancient roots consists of elements that constructively color its spectrum, both theoretically and in its application to legal reasoning, falling within its scientific domain.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item