Virtual Non-Contrast Reconstructions Derived from Dual-Energy CTA Scans in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Comparison with True Non-Contrast Images and Impact on Radiation Dose

Szablics, Fanni Éva and Bérczi, Ákos and Csőre, Judit and Borzsák, Sarolta and Szentiványi, András Imre and Kiss, Mate and Juhász, Georgina and Papp, Dora and Suhai, Ferenc Imre and Csobay-Novák, Csaba (2025) Virtual Non-Contrast Reconstructions Derived from Dual-Energy CTA Scans in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Comparison with True Non-Contrast Images and Impact on Radiation Dose. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 14 (15). No. 5571. ISSN 2077-0383

Preview

Text jcm-14-05571.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (757kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Virtual non-contrast (VNC) images derived from dual-energy CTA (DE-CTA) could potentially replace true non-contrast (TNC) scans while reducing radiation exposure. This study evaluated the image quality of VNC compared to TNC for assessing native arteries and bypass grafts in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 175 patients (111 men, 64 women, mean age: 69.3 +/- 9.5 years) with PAD who underwent lower extremity DE-CTA. Mean attenuation and image noise values of TNC and VNC images were measured in native arteries and bypass grafts at six arterial levels, from the aorta to the popliteal arteries, using circular regions of interest (ROI). Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated. Three independent radiologists evaluated the subjective image quality of VNC images compared to baseline TNC scans for overall quality (4-point Likert scale), and for residual contrast medium (CM), calcium subtractions, and bypass graft visualization (3-point Likert scales). Radiation dose parameters (DLP, CTDIvol) were recorded to estimate effective dose values (ED) and the potential radiation dose reduction. Differences between TNC and VNC measurements and radiation dose parameters were compared using a paired t-test. Interobserver agreement was assessed with Gwet's AC2. Results: VNC attenuation and noise values were significantly lower across all native arterial levels (p < 0.05, mean difference: 4.7 HU-10.8 HU) and generally lower at all bypass regions (mean difference: 2.2 HU-13.8 HU). Mean image quality scores were 3.03 (overall quality), 2.99 (residual contrast), 2.04 (subtracted calcifications), and 3.0 (graft visualization). Inter-reader agreement was excellent for each assessment (AC2 >= 0.81). The estimated radiation dose reduction was 36.8% (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: VNC reconstructions demonstrated comparable image quality to TNC in a PAD assessment and offer substantial radiation dose reduction, supporting their potential as a promising alternative in clinical practice. Further prospective studies and optimization of reconstruction algorithms remain essential to confirm diagnostic accuracy and address remaining technical limitations.

Actions (login required)

View Item