Implementation of the EU's Health Technology Assessment regulation: where does existing methods guidance require concretization and what are the relevant methodological options?

Goetz, Gregor and Schandelmaier, Stefan and Busse, Reinhard and Wild, Claudia and Panteli, Dimitra (2025) Implementation of the EU's Health Technology Assessment regulation: where does existing methods guidance require concretization and what are the relevant methodological options? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 41 (1). No. e9. ISSN 0266-4623

Preview

Text Goetz_Schandelmaier_Int J Tech Assess Health Care_2025.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (542kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The EUnetHTA Core Model is well-established in the HTA community. Some recommendations of corresponding guidance documents leave room for alternative methodological choices. Considering the new HTA regulation (HTAR), we aimed to identify needs for concretization (NCs) in EUnetHTA guidance and provide indicative methodological options. METHODS We carried out a qualitative document analysis and structured group discussion. Twenty-two EUnetHTA documents were screened using transparent criteria. Identified NCs were classified into topics according to the PRISMA statement and presented to Austrian HTA practitioners ( = 11) during a structured group discussion. Participants rated NC's importance. To identify potential solutions, selected key handbooks for generic (Cochrane) and HTA-specific (IQWIG/NICE) evidence synthesis were systematically reviewed and matching content was charted against the NCs. RESULTS Thirty-two topics with varying numbers of NCs were identified, twenty-six during the screening process, and six from the group discussion. Most of the topics related to evidence synthesis methods (nine topics), evidence eligibility criteria (nine topics), risk of bias (three topics), and certainty assessment (three topics). Other topics related to information sources, search strategy, data collection process, data items, effect measures, and reporting bias. One or more methodological approaches and recommendations could be identified for each identified topic from the included methodological handbooks. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis identified a need for concretization in some EUnetHTA guidelines. The structured overview of methodological options may support HTA doers in adapting and applying the guidelines to the national and local practical context.

Actions (login required)

View Item